This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
math121a-f23:october_11_wednesday [2023/10/11 16:35] pzhou |
math121a-f23:october_11_wednesday [2026/02/21 14:41] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| If we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_x, | If we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_x, | ||
| - | $$ \langle f(x), g(x) \rangle_x = (1/N) \sum_{x \in V_x} f(x) \overline{g(x)}, | + | $$ \langle f, g\rangle_x = (1/N) \sum_{x \in V_x} f(x) \overline{g(x)}, |
| and we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_p, | and we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_p, | ||
| - | $$ \langle F(p), G(p) \rangle_p = \sum_{p \in V_p} F(p) \overline{G(p)}. $$ | + | $$ \langle F, G \rangle_p = \sum_{p \in V_p} F(p) \overline{G(p)}. $$ |
| then we find that Fourier transformation is compatible with the two inner products, namely | then we find that Fourier transformation is compatible with the two inner products, namely | ||
| $$ \langle f, g \rangle_x = \langle F, G \rangle_p, \quad F = FT(f), G = FT(g). $$ | $$ \langle f, g \rangle_x = \langle F, G \rangle_p, \quad F = FT(f), G = FT(g). $$ | ||
| ==== Example 1: N = 2 ==== | ==== Example 1: N = 2 ==== | ||
| + | A function $f(x)$ is determined by its values $f(0), f(1)$. Similarly for $F(p)$. | ||
| + | We have relations | ||
| + | $$ F(0) = (1/2) (f(0) + f(1)), \quad F(1) = (1/2) (f(0) - f(1)). $$ | ||
| + | So, we can reconstruct $f(x)$ from $F(p)$, by | ||
| + | $$ f(0) = F(0) + F(1), \quad f(1) = F(0) - F(1). $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== An important equality ==== | ||
| + | $1 + (-1) = 0. $ | ||
| + | and less obviously | ||
| + | $1 + e^{2\pi i / 3} + e^{2\pi i (2/3)} = 0$ | ||
| + | more generally | ||
| + | $$ \sum_{j=0}^{N-1} e^{2\pi i (j/N)} = 0 $$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | How to see this? You can say, this is the sum of all the $N$-th roots of unity, and we have | ||
| + | $$ z^N - 1 = \prod_{j=0}^{N-1} ( z - e^{2\pi i (j/N)}). $$ | ||
| + | hence by looking at the coefficient of $z^{N-1}$, we see the sum of all the roots is 0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Or, draw these roots as vectors on the complex plane, they show up as evenly distributed on the unit circle, since the summands are invariant under rotation by $2\pi/N$, hence the result is invariant under such a rotation. And the only possible number is 0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Example 2: N = 3 ==== | ||
| + | try it yourself. | ||
| + | |||