User Tools

Site Tools


math121a-f23:october_11_wednesday

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
math121a-f23:october_11_wednesday [2023/10/11 16:35]
pzhou created
math121a-f23:october_11_wednesday [2026/02/21 14:41] (current)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 Let 'x-space' be $V_x = \Z/ N \Z = \{0,1, \cdots, N-1\}$, and then (rescaled) 'p-space' is also $V_p = \Z / N\Z$, then we can build the Fourier transformation kernel Let 'x-space' be $V_x = \Z/ N \Z = \{0,1, \cdots, N-1\}$, and then (rescaled) 'p-space' is also $V_p = \Z / N\Z$, then we can build the Fourier transformation kernel
-$$ K(x,p) = e^{2\pi i \frac{x p}{N}} : V_x \times V_p \to U(1) $$+$$ K(x,p) = e^{2\pi i (x p N)} : V_x \times V_p \to U(1) $$
 where $U(1)$ is the unit circle in complex number.  where $U(1)$ is the unit circle in complex number. 
  
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 If we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_x,\C)$ as If we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_x,\C)$ as
-$$ \langle f(x), g(x) \rangle_x = (1/N) \sum_{x \in V_x} f(x) \overline{g(x)}, $$+$$ \langle f, g\rangle_x = (1/N) \sum_{x \in V_x} f(x) \overline{g(x)}, $$
 and we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_p,\C)$ as and we define hermitian inner product on $Fun(V_p,\C)$ as
-$$ \langle F(p), G(p) \rangle_p =  \sum_{p \in V_p} F(p) \overline{G(p)}. $$+$$ \langle F, G \rangle_p =  \sum_{p \in V_p} F(p) \overline{G(p)}. $$
 then we find that Fourier transformation is compatible with the two inner products, namely then we find that Fourier transformation is compatible with the two inner products, namely
 $$ \langle f, g \rangle_x = \langle F, G \rangle_p, \quad F = FT(f), G = FT(g). $$ $$ \langle f, g \rangle_x = \langle F, G \rangle_p, \quad F = FT(f), G = FT(g). $$
  
 ==== Example 1: N = 2 ==== ==== Example 1: N = 2 ====
 +A function $f(x)$ is determined by its values $f(0), f(1)$. Similarly for $F(p)$. 
 +We have relations
 +$$ F(0) = (1/2) (f(0) + f(1)), \quad F(1) = (1/2) (f(0) - f(1)). $$
 +So, we can reconstruct $f(x)$ from $F(p)$, by
 +$$ f(0) = F(0) + F(1), \quad f(1) = F(0) - F(1). $$
 +
 +==== An important equality ====
 +$1 + (-1) = 0. $
 +and less obviously
 +$1 + e^{2\pi i / 3} + e^{2\pi i (2/3)} = 0$
 +more generally
 +$$ \sum_{j=0}^{N-1} e^{2\pi i (j/N)} = 0 $$
 +
 +How to see this? You can say, this is the sum of all the $N$-th roots of unity, and we have 
 +$$ z^N - 1 = \prod_{j=0}^{N-1} ( z - e^{2\pi i (j/N)}). $$
 +hence by looking at the coefficient of $z^{N-1}$, we see the sum of all the roots is 0. 
 +
 +Or, draw these roots as vectors on the complex plane, they show up as evenly distributed on the unit circle, since the summands are invariant under rotation by $2\pi/N$, hence the result is invariant under such a rotation. And the only possible number is 0. 
 +
 +==== Example 2: N = 3 ====
 +try it yourself. 
 +
  
  
math121a-f23/october_11_wednesday.1697042112.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/21 14:44 (external edit)