User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:s:samuels

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:s:samuels [2022/02/19 03:53]
samuel_speas
math105-s22:s:samuels [2026/02/21 14:41] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
- 
 Here are some {{ :math105-s22:s:measure_theory_notes.pdf | notes}}, mostly from Tao's Introduction to Measure Theory. Here are some {{ :math105-s22:s:measure_theory_notes.pdf | notes}}, mostly from Tao's Introduction to Measure Theory.
 A few exercises are thrown in, mostly sketches. I focused on material not found or emphasized in Analysis II. I'll update the pdf regularly, if anyone stopping by is interested in reading them I will be typesetting the occasional solution to exercises in this book. If anyone wants to do so together, or to discuss some exercises in general at any point, that would be nice! A few exercises are thrown in, mostly sketches. I focused on material not found or emphasized in Analysis II. I'll update the pdf regularly, if anyone stopping by is interested in reading them I will be typesetting the occasional solution to exercises in this book. If anyone wants to do so together, or to discuss some exercises in general at any point, that would be nice!
Line 16: Line 15:
  
 As Terence Tao said, the Lebesgue integral can handle "noise" or "error". The difference between the two and the motivation for the Lebesgue theory is demonstrated nicely by  $[0,1]\Q^2$, the "bullet-riddled-square". The square and the set of bullets $[0,1]^2\cup\Q^2$ have Jordan inner measure zero, and Jordan outer measure 1. The indicator function of the bullets over the square is not Riemann integrable, but it is Lebesgue integrable, as the "noise" $Q^2$ poses no problems.  As Terence Tao said, the Lebesgue integral can handle "noise" or "error". The difference between the two and the motivation for the Lebesgue theory is demonstrated nicely by  $[0,1]\Q^2$, the "bullet-riddled-square". The square and the set of bullets $[0,1]^2\cup\Q^2$ have Jordan inner measure zero, and Jordan outer measure 1. The indicator function of the bullets over the square is not Riemann integrable, but it is Lebesgue integrable, as the "noise" $Q^2$ poses no problems. 
 +
 +**Littlewood's Three Principals:
 +** 
 +(i) Every (measurable) set is nearly a finite sum of intervals;
 +
 +(ii) Every (absolutely integrable) function is nearly continuous;
 +
 +(iii) Every (pointwise) convergent subsequence of functions is nearly uniformly convergent.
 +
 +These three principals are an intuitive rephrasing of some results that we have learned. We can find such a sum in (i) using a G-delta cover, and expressing at open set as a countable collection of disjoint (up to some error), or almost disjoint boxes.
 +
 +Littlewood's second theorem is a consequence of Egorov's theorem. We can take some closed set on which our function is continuous, and an epsilon set on which it is not. This is also essentially Lusin's theorem, mentioned above.
 +
 +The third principle is essentially Egorov's theorem.
 +
  
 Most recent copy of: Most recent copy of:
Line 22: Line 36:
  
 {{ :math105-s22:s:hw3-105-samuels.pdf | homework 3}} {{ :math105-s22:s:hw3-105-samuels.pdf | homework 3}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105_hw4.pdf |homework 4}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw5.pdf |homework 5}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw6.pdf |homework 6}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw7.pdf |homework 7 (needs revision)}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw8.pdf |homework 8}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw9.pdf |homework 9}}
 +
 +{{ :math105-s22:s:105-hw10.pdf |homework 10}}
math105-s22/s/samuels.1645242816.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/21 14:43 (external edit)