User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:notes:lecture_5

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:notes:lecture_5 [2022/02/01 07:39]
pzhou
math105-s22:notes:lecture_5 [2026/02/21 14:41] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lecture 5 ====== ====== Lecture 5 ======
 $\gdef\mcal{\mathcal{M}}$ $\gdef\mcal{\mathcal{M}}$
 +
 +[[https://berkeley.zoom.us/rec/share/xjmorYXsD5aEU3_mS6oHTOc413MzXAOIKlj5v1LUWOksJVeNeLzhp-QSVBff_AEF.sRwBxAiQgwZnO3D9 | video ]]
  
 Welcome back to in-person instruction. I will continue type in here as a way to prepare for class.  Welcome back to in-person instruction. I will continue type in here as a way to prepare for class. 
Line 48: Line 50:
  
 ===== Pugh 6.4: Regularity ===== ===== Pugh 6.4: Regularity =====
-Our goal here is to prove that, any Lebesgue measurable set is a Borel set plus or minus a null-set. More precisely. $E$ is Lebesgue measurable, if and only if there is a $G_\delta$-set (countable intersection of open) $G$, and an $F_\sigma$-set, $F$, where $F \In E \In G$, such that $m(G) = m(F)$.+Our goal here is to prove that, any Lebesgue measurable set is a Borel set plus or minus a null-set. More precisely. $E$ is Lebesgue measurable, if and only if there is a $G_\delta$-set (countable intersection of open) $G$, and an $F_\sigma$-set, $F$, where $F \In E \In G$, such that $m(G \RM F) = 0$ (why not asking $m(G) = m(F)$? )
  
  
math105-s22/notes/lecture_5.1643701193.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/21 14:43 (external edit)