This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
math104-s22:s:ajitkadaveru:start [2022/02/15 07:37] ajitkadaveru |
math104-s22:s:ajitkadaveru:start [2026/02/21 14:41] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| HW4: {{ : | HW4: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW5: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW6: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW7: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW8: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW9: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW10: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | HW11: {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Is there a more systematic way of finding subsequential limits? For some of the homework problems, I just sort of guessed some subsequences and their limits and it was easy to tell, but I'd imagine its hard to do that for other sequences. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. I'm a bit confused about the proof to show that cauchy implies convergence. How do we know what epsilon to choose so that we get a contradiction (here we chose (A-B)/3) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. In lecture, we went over a lemma that limsup a_n = A then for all epsilon > 0, N > 0, there exists n > N such that |a_n - A| < epsilon, but isn't that true by definition. Why did we have to do a more formal proof of it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. I see the common approach in 104 problems as to take cases when something is finite or infinite. This can help a lot, but is there a general sort of problem where I can use this strategy? A lot of times I get stuck and don't know what to use. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Is there a specific strategy for dealing with logarithms. None of the series tests seem friendly to this function. Is it always like some clever comparison? | ||