User Tools

Site Tools


math104-s21:s:victoriatuck

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math104-s21:s:victoriatuck [2021/05/11 19:39]
73.158.208.111 [Questions]
math104-s21:s:victoriatuck [2026/02/21 14:41] (current)
Line 31: Line 31:
 The confusion with this question for me lay with the use of the limit point argument for situations such as $E = (0, 1) \cap \mathbb{Q}$, which is not closed. However, the difference here is that 1 and 0 are rational numbers. The confusion with this question for me lay with the use of the limit point argument for situations such as $E = (0, 1) \cap \mathbb{Q}$, which is not closed. However, the difference here is that 1 and 0 are rational numbers.
  
-2. Question: Is the set $(0,2) \cap \mathbb{Q}$ connected on $\mathbb{Q}$? [With explanation]+2. Question: Is the set $E = (0,2) \cap \mathbb{Q}$ connected on $\mathbb{Q}$? [With explanation]
  
-Answer:+Answer: No, this set is disconnected. $\mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R}$. Therefore, in general, we can pick an element outside of our set E but inside the metric space $\mathbb{R}$ i.e., $x \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$ to "split" our set E into two open subsets $U_1 = (0, x) \cap \mathbb{Q}$, $U_2 = (x, 2) \cap \mathbb{Q}$ where $(E \cap U_1) \cap (E \cap U_2) = \varnothing$ and $(E \cap U_1) \cup (E \cap U_2) = E$ where $E \cap U_1 \neq \varnothing$ and $E \cap U_2 \neq \varnothing$. Thus, we can use the definition of a disconnected set to show that E is a disconnected set.
  
 3. Question: Let $f: X -> Y$ be a continuous mapping with $A \subset X$ and $B \subset Y$. I know that if B is open/closed then $f^{-1}(B)$ is open/closed, respectively, but why is this true? 3. Question: Let $f: X -> Y$ be a continuous mapping with $A \subset X$ and $B \subset Y$. I know that if B is open/closed then $f^{-1}(B)$ is open/closed, respectively, but why is this true?
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 4. Question: Exam 2, Problem 5. Let $f: \mathbb{Q} -> \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous map. Is it true that one can always find a continuous map $g: \mathbb{R} -> \mathbb{R}$ extending $f$, namely, $g(x) = f(x)$ for any $x \in \mathbb{Q}$? Prove or find a counterexample. 4. Question: Exam 2, Problem 5. Let $f: \mathbb{Q} -> \mathbb{R}$ be a continuous map. Is it true that one can always find a continuous map $g: \mathbb{R} -> \mathbb{R}$ extending $f$, namely, $g(x) = f(x)$ for any $x \in \mathbb{Q}$? Prove or find a counterexample.
 +
 +Answer:
 +
 +5. Assume f is a continuous map $f: X -> Y$ with $A \subset X$ and $B \subset Y$
 +
 +a) Question: What is a counterexample to "If $A$ is closed, then $f(A)$ is closed".
 +
 +Answer: Let $f := arctan(x)$. Then $(-\infty, \infty) -> (-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2})$.
 +
 +b) Question: What is a counterexample to "If $B$ is connected, then $f^{-1}(B)$ is connected."?
 +
 +Answer: Let $f := x^2$. Then $[1, \infty) -> (-\infty, -1] \cup [1, \infty)$, which is disconnected.
 +
 +6. Question: Given an open cover $\mathcal{U}$ of $f(E)$ where f is a continuous function and E is a compact set, why is $\{f^{-1}(U) : U \in \mathcal{U}\}$ a cover of E? [Question from Ross Theorem 21.4]
 +
 +Answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/605195/detail-on-a-theorem-of-continuity-and-compactness
 +
 +7. Question: For non 1-to-1 functions (like $f = x^2$), how do we define the inverse $f^{-1}$ of a set in the range of that function? E.g., for $x^2$, what would $f^{-1}([1, inf))$ be?
 +
 +Answer: In Ross 168, we define the inverse $f^{-1}(U)$ to include any value $s$ st $f(s) \in U$. So $f^{-1}([1, inf)) = (-inf, -1] \cup [1, inf)$.
 +
 +8. Question: 
math104-s21/s/victoriatuck.1620761942.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/21 14:44 (external edit)