User Tools

Site Tools


math104-f21:hw4

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math104-f21:hw4 [2021/09/16 17:45]
pzhou created
math104-f21:hw4 [2026/02/21 14:41] (current)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 5. Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence in $\R$, and $A = \lim sup(a_n)$, show that for any $\epsilon > 0$, the set $\{ n \in \N \mid A - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq A+\epsilon \}$ is infinite.  5. Let $(a_n)$ be a bounded sequence in $\R$, and $A = \lim sup(a_n)$, show that for any $\epsilon > 0$, the set $\{ n \in \N \mid A - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq A+\epsilon \}$ is infinite. 
 +
 +====== Solution ======
 +1. Suffice to show that, for any $\epsilon>0$, there is an $N$, such that for all $n>N$, we have 
 +$$ |a_n - x| \leq \epsilon,  $$
 +which is 
 +$$ x - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq x + \epsilon. $$
 +By Cauchy condition for $a_n$, take $\epsilon_1 = \epsilon$, there exists $N_1 > 0$, such that for all $n,m> N_1$, we have $|a_n - a_m| < \epsilon_1$, in particular, we have 
 +$$ a_m - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq a_m + \epsilon. $$
 +Consider the sequence $(a_m)_{m = N_1}^\infty$, then we have its formal limit satisfies, for all $n > N_1$, 
 +$$ x - \epsilon = (LIM a_m) - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq (LIM a_m) + \epsilon = x + \epsilon. $$
 +Finally, take $N = N_1$. 
 +
 +2. Take any $N > 2|a|$, then for any $n > N$, we have 
 +$$ |a_{n} / a_{n-1}| = |a| / n < 1/2 $$
 +Hence $|a_{n}| \leq |a_{N}| (1/2)^{n-N}$, take limit $n \to \infty$ shows the result. 
 +
 +3. Since $A$ is bounded above, we know the $x=sup(A)$ exists. Suppose $x^2 < 3$, then by the same argument as in Prop 5.5.12, we have a small enough $\epsilon>0$, such that $(x+\epsilon)^2 < 3$, then let $q$ be a rational number, such that $x < q < x+\epsilon$, we have $q^2 < 3$, hence $q \in A$. This contradicts with with $x$ being the $sup$ of $A$. Suppose $x^2 > 3$, then we can find small enough $\epsilon>0$, such that $(x-\epsilon)^2 > 3$, in particular $x-\epsilon$ is also an upperbound of $A$, hence contradict with $x$ being the upper bound, hence $x^2 = 3$. 
 +
 +
 +4. Since $s_{n+1}^2 = 1 + s_n$, and $(s_n)$ converges, hence 
 +$$ \lim s_{n+1}^2 = \lim(1 + s_n) $$
 +which gives 
 +$$ c^2 = 1 + c $$
 +solving this gives $c = (\pm \sqrt{5}+1)/2 $$. Since $s_n$ are all positive by induction and, we see $c = ( \sqrt{5}+1)/2$
 +
 +5. This is covered in last Friday's lecture, where we proved that $L=\limsup(a_n)$ is a limit point of $a_n$. Here we give the proof again. 
 +
 +We prove by contradiction, suppose there is an $\epsilon>0$, such that there are only finitely many terms in $(a_n)$ contained in $[L-\epsilon, L+\epsilon]$. Then there exists an $N_1$, such that for all $n>N_1$, $|a_n - L| > \epsilon$. By property of $\limsup$, we know there also exists $N_2$, such that for all $n > N_2$, $a_n < L + \epsilon$. Then, for $n > N= \max(N_1, N_2)$, we have 
 +$$ |a_n - L| > \epsilon,  \quad a_n < L + \epsilon \Rightarrow a_n < L - \epsilon.$$
 +Taking $\limsup$ on the left, we get $$ L \leq L - \epsilon$, which is a contradiction. 
 +
 +
 +
  
  
  
math104-f21/hw4.1631814353.txt.gz · Last modified: 2026/02/21 14:43 (external edit)